![[Yahoo! Messenger]](http://eur.yimg.com/i/fr/msg/pagerbutton3.gif){kind=small}
Tchatez avec le webmestre ? have a chat with the webmaster ? Download Yahoo messenger and look for xavier_martin_dupont as id
Vous désirez me contacter téléphoniquement :06 11 73 67 85
The opus that
you have the honour and the advantage of observing here is quoted from the
Raël's work : the book which says the Truth on page 24 (1978 edition
)chapter entitled the Genesis.
It is thus supposed to describe the engineeringgenetic laboratory of a society
which would be "25000 years" in advance" on ours.
The only problem is that obviously the iconography - analogical indicators,
screens with curve - and all the remainder's, rather makes think of the representation
that a twelve thirteen year old child could be done of an extraterrestrial
base and this in the years 50-60.
As for the materials "of genetic engineering", what to say about
the two retorts which everybody will in vain wonder to what they are connected.
Nowconsidering the serpentine wich seem to emerge nowhere, it summarizes with
the set of test-tubes posed on the desk all of the science of the elohistic
genetics.
A curious problem of perspective must bee also noticed: an elohim is supposed
to be around 1m 20, but if we compare to Adam and Eve (cf the title of the
chapter) they are below the threshold - the size of the elohim on the foreground
would be that of a child of 7-8 years) while if we sticks to the rules of
the prospect, the elohims in the last plan must be a little close to the same
size as our Adam and his Eve. Other point: the "creatures do not have
any distinctive signs - milked faces concerns simple outlines, with share
of course the famous goatee, and their eyes are summarized with features.
The aureole is supposed to be the trace of the space suit - there still there
is a contradiction - I leave to the specialists the care to guess which).
One can also put some questions as for the anatomical coherence of those beings.
Also to notice that the proportions and the details of the couple are comparatively
much better than those of the elohims. What can conclude from that if Raël
undoubtedly saw a naked man and an adult woman, but that it is difficult to
him to represent in a coherent way something that he never saw. However note
a very clear improvement of the graphical elohim's chart on the in the other
versions of the Book which says the Truth, which is posterior with
this republication. Last note : the alien's seems curiously asexualed in any
case any discernible trace through the combination to note the difference
- with the second representation of the meeting.
What ask serious question is that graphically vaguenes and incoherent character
of the elohims whereas Raël is supposed to be precisely the only one
who have seen them, and we should expect under these conditions and for as
outstanding meeting with another thing as these homunculus. Now briefly let
us compare with the illustration of the same chapter for the edition of 1974.
 |
Of course, if the two scene have no direct relationship, the creationist
thematic remains the same one and has a side very high tech including for
the time (cf. the representation of the ADN in the form of double helix).
Remain the antiquated test-tube, on the matter. Another point: of course
Raël is not any more the author of these illustrations, from where
improvement of the quality of graphics.
|
|
|
It is useless to reconsider again the "childish" characters already
empahized in my first comment, but let us note however that the scene represented
in the two illustrations differs on many points. In the initial representation
- that Raël is supposed to have drawn itself - it does not carry a
jacket, contrary to the version of 1974. Note also the different attitude
of Raël in both cases. Also let us raise that the meeting does not
take place obviously at the same distance, which implies a contradiction
on the narratif level in the account of the meeting such as it brought back
it in addition. For the geographical framework of the two drawings which
are supposed to represent the same places, it differ them too; let us say
that we are here in the presence of an alternative of the play of the seven
errors much more than of a meeting of the standard third. The only notable
improvement compared to the scene of the genesis according to Rael is that
it seems to have applied to its saucer, saucers which are some little bâclées
in the first scene of the genesis.
Identifiant skype : zelohim -tel :
Mobile :06 11 73 67 85
